The use of foreign flags on municipal property, names such as Palestine Square and municipal boycotts of certain goods: The debate about how far municipalities can and should go when global conflicts affect local values is highly topical.
‘The main rule is that municipalities cannot conduct foreign policy,’ states Karsten Naundrup Olesen, professor at the Faculty of Law, University of Copenhagen.
He is the author of a newly published research article that maps out what municipalities can and cannot do when foreign policy and local politics intersect.
Karsten Naundrup Olesen points to two basic principles that are important in this context. The principle of locality: The municipality must primarily look after the interests of its own citizens. And the principle of division of tasks: Foreign policy is the prerogative of the state.
Based on these principles, for decades, municipal supervisory authorities have maintained a ban on municipal statements of a foreign policy nature in their practice.
Important exceptions
Karsten Naundrup Olesen points out, however, that despite this starting point, municipalities are not completely barred from making statements that could be said to have a foreign policy aspect. Municipalities can act with a view to:
- Humanitarian aid via recognised organisations and without political statements.
- Environmental support, e.g. modest contributions to rainforest conservation, when the purpose is global climate/ecology.
- Social responsibility in procurement, where municipalities must promote decent working conditions, human rights and sustainability – for example, by choosing fair trade products.
- Making statements related to the state's foreign policy.
The latter was seen when Russia invaded Ukraine, where Danish cooperation on Russian twin towns and investments was dropped. Here, municipalities were part of the state's overall signal.
